Marduk and Tiamat: the Battle Before the World

The Enuma Elish, the Babylonian creation epic, is not an apocalypse. It is the opposite: a story about how the world began with a battle, told in the eighth century BCE on the festival of the new year. But it belongs in this archive because it is the prototype of the end. The combat myth it codifies — a young god slays a chaos-dragon and from her corpse fashions the cosmos — is the skeleton on which later apocalypses would hang flesh. When the author of Revelation describes the dragon, or Zoroastrian texts the final battle against the forces of evil, they are drawing on a pattern first worked out in Babylon.

The story: before heaven and earth, there was Apsu, the sweet-water deep, and Tiamat, the salt-water dragon. Their children, the younger gods, made so much noise that Apsu resolved to destroy them. The younger gods killed Apsu first. Tiamat, grieving and furious, raised an army of monsters — serpents, the scorpion-man, the lion-headed storm — and crowned her second husband Kingu as her champion. The young gods could not face her until Marduk, the youngest and most ambitious, agreed to fight on condition that he be made king of the gods. He fought Tiamat with winds and a net, split her like a shellfish, and from her corpse built the sky and the earth, the constellations and the rivers. The blood of her consort Kingu became humanity.

Norman Cohn's argument in Cosmos, Chaos and the World to Come is that this myth, carried west through the Near East and transformed by Zoroaster into a struggle that ends the world instead of beginning it, is the deep root of Western apocalyptic faith. The Babylonians kept the battle in the past: chaos was defeated once, at creation, and the new-year festival re-enacted the victory to hold chaos at bay. What changed with Zoroastrianism, and later with the prophets of Israel, was the tense. The battle was moved to the future. Chaos would return, be defeated again, and this time the victory would be final.

The Enuma Elish is the archive's reminder that apocalypse is a grammatical shift: the same story, moved from the past to the future, turns creation into the end of the world.